tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5251183560375528307.post4304840035868414865..comments2024-03-27T21:44:21.033-05:00Comments on Bit Tooth Energy: Restarting the Temperature reviews - Missouri RAW dataHeading Outhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01790783659594652657noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5251183560375528307.post-25082504792083200012011-12-12T05:59:11.431-06:002011-12-12T05:59:11.431-06:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5251183560375528307.post-14364973277753354732010-07-04T22:13:18.373-05:002010-07-04T22:13:18.373-05:00Missouri, at the moment, is high humidity. Because...Missouri, at the moment, is high humidity. Because I didn't look at elevation until I reached Kansas (which is going to be next - after I am done with MO) - and there is the interplay with Longitude since the Rockies are to the immediate West - I wanted to get a significant amount more information into the system before I do more than just very simple analysis.Heading Outhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01790783659594652657noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5251183560375528307.post-68657587198305302472010-07-04T11:07:09.489-05:002010-07-04T11:07:09.489-05:00This has been an interesting series of posts, HO. ...This has been an interesting series of posts, HO. It is always good to see someone looking at the real data!<br /><br />Your graph of temperature versus elevation suggests a trend of 5.2 Fahrenheit degrees drop per 1,000 feet increase in elevation, with quite a large scatter in the data.<br /><br />This compares with nominal adiabatic atmospheric lapse rates of 3 deg F per 1,000 feet for wet (100% humidity air) to 5 deg F per 1,000 feet for dry air.<br /><br />Would you describe Missouri as a low-humidity environment? Or are there other factors at work?Kinuachdrachhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13275320683766290581noreply@blogger.com