tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5251183560375528307.post7107834136040076877..comments2024-03-28T21:34:42.328-05:00Comments on Bit Tooth Energy: The Climate Change debate in 2010Heading Outhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01790783659594652657noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5251183560375528307.post-18964716815882888222010-01-03T20:31:30.647-06:002010-01-03T20:31:30.647-06:00I wish I could be that confident. But I fear that...I wish I could be that confident. But I fear that there are too many in the current Administration who are anxious to see movement in this as their legacy to their period in Government. As a result it is more a political and "religious" matter than one where science is the driver.Heading Outhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01790783659594652657noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5251183560375528307.post-27861529805101972832010-01-03T17:43:24.885-06:002010-01-03T17:43:24.885-06:00"I suspect that each of the two camps will co...<i>"I suspect that each of the two camps will continue to talk past the other"</i><br /><br />That is certainly likely. Claims of Alleged Anthropogenic Warming have long since ceased to be about science. There is definite peer-pressure on those of certain political persuasions to pay lip-service (at least) to AGW.<br /><br />My guess is that AGW will fade away from public discourse, rather as the predicted Great Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic faded away in the 1990s. It won't be the bad science that kills AGW, unfortunately. It will be the exigencies enforced by declining economies and worsening security situation.Kinuachdrachhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13275320683766290581noreply@blogger.com