The first difference is in world population, which BP anticipates will grow by 1.4 billion by 2030, EM is a little more conservative, with growth closer to 1 billion for a total of 7.9 billion. (Current population is 6.9 billion. EM relies on the UN and the World Bank for its figure). In itself this changes the overall level of demand, since both expect that per capita consumption of energy will also rise. There is one oddity that I might initially mention (and yes I know the dollar base differs) but contrast these two graphs – the left is from BP and the right from EM.

While I did not get the scales exactly the same, you can see, to a first estimate, that the global GDP in 2030 for EM is roughly the same size as the Non-OECD GDP estimated by BP. (A quick check on Google says that the current GDP is at $58 trillion). This difference continues in the assumptions of the areas of greatest growth. While, as can be seen above, BP sees OECD growth as virtually flat and all the increment being from non-OECD, EM has OECD growing at 2% and non-OECD at 5%. But that will still only put the non-OECD at 40% of the global economy by 2030, which is the inverse of the BP projection.
Change in GDP does not however easily translate into changes in energy consumption, particularly given the much lower relative energy consumption of the non-OECD countries. EM sees energy use in the OECD staying relatively flat, the gain in GDP is accomplished with an increase in the efficiency of energy use. (Which agrees with the BP position). Thus by 2030 it is the non-OECD countries that will increase demand to the point that they will have an energy demand that is 75% higher than that of the OECD.
With that as background, where and how much energy does EM anticipate will be used in this future. To make the two forecasts simpler to follow I have had to convert since while BP works in millions of barrels of oil equivalent (mboe) throughout, EM uses Quadrillion Btu’s or Quads in places. (A barrel of oil is equivalent to 5.8 million Btu, or conversely 1 Quad is equivalent to 172 million boe). And then to make life a little more fun BP has used tons of oil equivalent, making the Quad equivalent to 24 million tons of oil equivalent. (Using 7.16 barrels to the ton to simplify future arithmetic). Having done that, and with a little Photoshop scaling, I can compare the two energy projections.

One of the immediately obvious items is that the amount of coal use that EM is projecting is considerably less than that projected by BP, there is a little more use of oil, and about the same amount of NG.
BP had generated a graph that predicted that by 2030 oil’s share of the global market would continue to fall, while after an initial increase in percentage use, coal would fall on a parallel path with oil, so that, by 2030, both would share equally with natural gas at about 26% of the global energy market each. The remainder of the market, at about 7% each would be equally divided between Hydro, Nuclear and Renewables. Of these renewables (which include biofuels and biomass) would have the steepest increase.

EM on the other hand see the energy supply in 2030 being divided so that oil retains 32% of the overall; natural gas has risen to 26%, and coal has fallen to 21% of the overall. The non-fossil sources are divided 8% for nuclear, 3% for hydro and 11% for the renewables that include biofuels and waste (which is not separately identified by BP).

The above plot shows percentage growth, rather than market share, so that while wind, solar and biofuel energy production grows strongly, by 2030 it is still providing only 3% of global energy.
Looking at the individual fossil fuels in turn – EM sees that India will provide the largest new market for coal, while Chinese demand will soon peak, and demand in the more industrialized nations declines in the face of increased concerns over carbon dioxide emissions.
Increased production from the Canadian oil sands will team with the growth of biofuels in a combined 5% contribution to global liquid fuels according to EM (this is a little less than that projected by BP, who has 2 mbd for oil sand and just over 4 mbd in biofuel growth). And, by 2030 EM expects that NGL supply will amount to about 10% of total hydrocarbon liquids, totaling around 11 mbd. This is quite a bit more than BP project (at about 4 mbd – though that is assigned only to the OPEC nations, and there could be more from other sources though that is not mentioned in the BP document).

EM’s answer to where all the additional oil is going to come from is Deepwater. It projects that by 2030 deepwater production will be at over 14 mbd. The more than doubling of production is anticipated to be almost across the globe, whether Africa, Europe, Latin America or North America.

Because of this emphasis on deepwater, and in order to provide reassurance against the likelihood of another major spill, EM discuss, within their document, the development of the Marine Well Containment System, which is designed to ensure against what happened this past year.
Natural Gas is the seen as the major growth fuel of the next 20 years, and EM anticipate that use of NG will rise to make it the second most popular fuel (bypassing coal but not oil) by 2030. Interestingly they see the supply of NG over the 2005 volumes as coming almost equally from conventional wells, from unconventional (gas shale) wells in the US and Canada, and from imports. (Though it doesn’t say where from). Unconventional supply is anticipated to grow five-fold.

In the end EM seems to be expecting more from natural gas than other fuels over the next twenty years, more so than BP. This seems to be a reasonable assumption, as I said when reviewing the BP projections, providing only that that there is that one new development (cheaper production and longer well life) that is needed for more viable shale gas production. This is particularly true when one looks at the primary sources of electric power generation, in the three main sectors of the world.

EM sees the United States and Europe being much more aggressive in reducing coal use, and expects a greater role to be played by nuclear power plants than BP.
In summary ExxonMobil has a much more positive view of the long term sustainability of oil as a fuel, with a much greater contribution from the deepwater than BP had projected. It sees the role of coal fading from the future energy field, while natural gas will continue to develop and gain market share.
dich vu lam bao cao tai chinh tai my dinh
ReplyDeletedich vu lam bao cao tai chinh tai hai ba trung
dich vu lam bao cao tai chinh tai ba dinh
dich vu lam bao cao tai chinh tai thanh tri
dich vu lam bao cao tai chinh tai hoang mai
dich vu lam bao cao tai chinh tai tay ho
dich vu lam bao cao tai chinh tai dong da
==========
dich vu ke toan thue tai dong da
dich vu ke toan thue tai tay ho
dich vu ke toan thue tai bac ninh
dich vu ke toan thue tai hai ba trung
dich vu ke toan thue tai tu liem
dich vu ke toan thue tai hoang mai
dich vu ke toan thue tai ba dinh
dich vu ke toan thue tai thanh tri
dich vu ke toan thue tai thai binh
cong ty lam dich vu ke toan tai vinh phuc
cong ty dich lam vu ke toan tai hung yen
cong ty dich lam vu ke toan tai phu tho
cong ty lam dich vu ke toan tai hai duong
cong ty lam dich vu ke toan tai hai phong
cong ty lam dich vu ke toan tai bac ninh
dich vu ke toan tai vinh phuc
dich vu ke toan tai hung yen
dich vu ke toan tai hai duong
dich vu ke toan tai tay ho
ReplyDeletedich vu ke toan tai ba đinh
dich vu ke toan tai hoang mai
dich vu ke toan tai thanh tri
dich vu ke toan tai dong da
dich vu ke toan tai tu liem
dich vu ke toan tai ha dong
dich vu ke toan tai long bien
dich vu ke toan tai thanh xuan
dich vu ke toan tai hai phong
dich vu ke toan tai bac ninh
dich vu ke toan tai hai ba trung
dich vu ke toan tai dong anh
dich vu ke toan tai gia lam
dich vu ke toan tai ung hoa
dich vu ke toan tai quoc oai
dich vu ke toan tai son tay
dich vu ke toan tai thanh oai
hoc ke toan tong hop
dich vu ke toan thue tron goi
dich vu bao cao tai chinh
dia chi hoc ke toan tong hop
khoa hoc ke toan tong hop
hoc chung chi ke toan
dich vu ke toan thue tai tphcm
lớp học kế toán tổng hợp
lớp học kế toán thực hành
dia chi hoc ke toan tai cau giay
ReplyDeletedia chi hoc ke toan tai ha dong
dia chi hoc ke toan tai bac ninh
trung tam dao tao ke toan tai ha dong
trung tam dao tao ke toan tai cầu giấy
trung tam dao tao ke toan tai thanh xuan
trung tam dao tao ke toan tai tphcm
khóa học kế toán tổng hợp tại hải phòng
khóa học kế toán tổng hợp tại tại bắc ninh
khóa học kế toán tổng hợp tại tphcm
khóa học kế toán tổng hợp tại hà nội
trung tam dao tao ke toan tai quan 3
trung tam dao tao ke toan tai binh duong
trung tam dao tao ke toan tai bac ninh
trung tam dao tao ke toan tai hai phong
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 12
ReplyDeletedịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 11
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 10
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 9
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 8
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 7
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 6
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 5
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 4
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 3
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 2
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận 1
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận tân phú
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận bình tân
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận phú nhuận
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận tân bình
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận gò vấp
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận thủ đức
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại quận bình thạnh
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại huyện cần giờ
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại huyện nhà bè
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại huyện bình chánh
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại huyện hóc môn
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại huyện củ chi
dịch vụ kế toán thuế tại huyện cần giờ
Dịch vụ kế toán ACB chuyên cung cấp dich vu ke toan trọn gói uy tín chuyên nghiêp giá rẻ nhất tại HCM và các tỉnh lân cận với chi phí bỏ ra chỉ từ 500.000-1.500.000đ.
ReplyDeleteTri ân khách hàng, ACB giảm giá lên đến 50% giá trị hợp đồng khi doanh nghiệp trở thành đối tác của chúng tôi.
Liên hệ: Dịch vụ kế toán , Dich vu ke toan .
Lầu 4, Tòa nhà Long Mã, 602 Cộng Hòa,P.13,Q.Tân Bình,HCM.
Hotline: (08) 62 97 97 97 - 0966 660 888.
شركة نقل عفش بالمدينة المنورة
ReplyDeleteشركة نقل عفش بالمدينة المنورة
شركة نقل عفش
ارخص شركة نقل عفش بالمدينة المنورة
شركة نقل عفش بالقصيم
شركة نقل عفش بخميس مشيط
شركة نقل عفش بابها
شركة نقل عفش بتبوك
ReplyDeleteشركة مكافحة حشرات بمكة
شركة كشف تسربات بمكة
شركة عزل اسطح بمكة
شركة تسليك مجاري بمكة
شركة تنظيف فلل بمكة
شركة تنظيف شقق بمكة
شركة تنظيف منازل بمكة
شركة تنظيف خزانات بمكة
شركة نقل عفش بالدمام
ReplyDeleteشركة نقل عفش بجدة
شركة نقل العفش بالمدينة المنورة
نقل العفش بالرياض
نقل عفش بالدمام
شركات نقل اثاث بالدمام
شركة نقل اثاث بالخبر
I'm so glad and enjoyed your BLOG, It is very informative on the subject or topic, and Thanks For Sharing this post. I have something to share here
ReplyDeletebuy modalert online
buy artvigil online
buy waklert online
buy modvigil online
buy vilafinil online