Tech Talk - changes in South American exports

One of the large concerns that came up repeatedly over the years of discussions, both of the articles and of Drumbeat at The Oil Drum (TOD) was the subject of growth in domestic demand from some of the larger suppliers of oil and natural gas. This growth would be to the cost of the export market, and will, therefore, over time, reduce the amount available to importing nations. This becomes an even more painful reality to the rest of the world when the projections about future performance turn out to have been overly ambitious. Consider the countries of Latin America, where, back in 2010, the EIA drew the following baseline:

Figure 1. The largest producers of liquid fuels in South America in 2010 (EIA )

The EIA anticipated that Brazilian production would reach 2.8 mbd in 2012, and 3.0 mbd this year. However, as the latest MOMR from OPEC notes, Brazil will likely produce only 2.61 mbd this year, with the potential to rise to 2.67 mbd by the end of the year. However the rise in domestic consumption, and the failure to achieve the production goals expected has had an impact on the exports to the United States.

Figure 2. The changing volumes of US imports from Brazil (EIA )

The EIA reported that Venezuela produced some 2.47 million barrels a day in 2011, of which the USA imported roughly 1 mbd. That volume has, however, been declining for some time. (Note that in the plot below the Virgin Island imports should perhaps be included, because the crude that runs through the refineries on the islands originates in Venezuela, but they are not in this plot). At the same time a significant proportion (250 kbd in 2010) is now being shipped from Venezuela to China.

Figure 3. The changing picture of US imports from Venezuela over the years (EIA )

The situation in Argentina similarly shows that as with the other countries internal consumption is rising, while in this case overall production is falling and there is a consequent impact on exports.

Figure 4. The oil balance in Argentina (EIA )

China has been getting around 20% of Argentinian exports, while, in 2011, the USA got 40%, but the volumes of US imports have now turned negative.

Figure 5. The changing picture of oil imports to the USA from Argentina (EIA )

Of the five countries that were tabulated at the top of the post, Colombia is the exception. Production is still rising significantly, however it should be noted that, back in 2010 when the USA received some 422 kbd of crude and refined products from the country, China was financing a pipeline to carry 600 kbd to the Colombian Pacific Coast.

Figure 6. The increase in oil production with little increase in domestic production in Colombia (EIA )

The oil for the pipeline is anticipated to come from both Venezuela and Colombia, and the preliminary agreement for its construction was signed in May, 2012. Venezuelan agreement is still lacking to the deal and Venezuela, which was supposed by now to be sending natural gas to Colombia (after having received supplies for years) has still not made the switch. Volumes of exports to the USA from Colombia have fluctuated recently, while India and China have been acquiring oil wells and their production, which then ships to Asia.

Figure 7. The changing picture of oil exports to the USA from Colombia (EIA).

And that leaves Ecuador., which for those who might have forgotten, is also a member of OPEC. (It rejoined in 2007 ) It produces around 500 kbd, and with internal consumption running at around 200 kbd, exports the rest.

Figure 8. The changing picture of oil exports to the USA from Ecuador (EIA )

The recent news that the President of Ecuador is opening the rain forest to oil development, after trying to find funds for preservation of the forest without it and failing. Ecuador has an increasing debt with China (about $20 billion) and this is forcing it to use oil exports as a way of servicing that debt. One $2 billion loan, for example, carries a return agreement for some 130 million barrels of oil over six-years (60 kbd). Part of the loan from China will be spent on refineries in country.

The point to note in all five cases is that the imports to the United States have been declining. Given the increase in US domestic production that is not wholly surprising, nor is there yet any immediate cause for concern. But it is what is happening to whatever excess that these countries produce, over that consumed domestically and in the US that is significant. Because, increasingly it is going to China, and to Asia in general.

The concern that this raises is that, should US production not continue to rise at the rates that the more cornucopian of the main stream commentators suggest, then there will come a time when the US will have to go back to its suppliers from the last decade to ask for more. And at that time the odds are going to be high that either the countries won’t be able to meet the demand because their own domestic consumption has consumed the surplus, or that the surplus has been sold to China.

Given that China is making investments at the moment in the South American oil infrastructure, from wells to pipelines, means that it will control this production, and that removes a significant source of supply, at a time when it will be needed.

OGPSS - Countries producing over 500 kbd - Malaysia, Australia, Colombia and Ecuador

Over the past few weeks I have been briefly discussing the amount of oil that the major producers of the world generate each year. Starting at the top, with Russia and Saudi Arabia, I have now arrived at the bottom end of the list of countries producing more than 500,000 bd. I am concluding with Malaysia (727 kbd), Australia (586 kbd), Colombia (602 kbd) and Equador (504 kbd). For those interested the list (the EIA top producers in 2008) would have continued with Sudan (480 kbd), Syria (401 kbd), Equatorial Guinea (359 kbd), Vietnam (337 kbd), and Thailand (328 kbd) to cover the countries that produce more than 300 kbd.

But my interest in these countries stems for the need that the world has for significant increased production, and the further that one moves down the list the harder it is to see any country being able to produce an extra 200 kbd say, to provide the additional power that Japan might need to replace the destroyed nuclear reactors, not to mention the 1.4 mbd that has been projected for the growth in demand of the world economy this year, nor the 1.6 mbd that the loss of Libyan production will impose on global supply.

So let us begin by looking at the production from Malaysia, which seems to have hit a plateau in production of crude oil in recent years. Production levels are projected to stay about current levels, slightly below 700 kbd through 2020, with some of that coming from enhanced oil recovery techniques. Malaysia is also the second largest producer of palm oil, at around 300 kbd though a lot of the latter is used in cooking.

Malaysia lies north of Indonesia (covered earlier in the series)

Malaysia (EIA map )
While production is holding relatively steady, consumption within the country is steadily increasing so that, before too long, it is likely that the country will cease to export oil, in a similar fate to that of Indonesia. This despite plans to further develop offshore fields.


Extrapolation of the above lines suggests that Malaysia has hardly any time left until it stops being able to export oil.

Natural gas, however, is another story, with steadily increasing production, to date, being able to out-perform increasing domestic consumption. Thus exports, which ran around 1 TCF in 2009, have continued to grow.


The country exports around 1 TCF of LNG, two-thirds of which went to Japan. With only one of the re-gassifying plants in Japan out of operation, LNG provides a way of meeting some of the current energy shortfall in Japan, and Malaysia is willing to help. Malaysia is also now supplying China with LNG, with flows into Shanghai anticipated to rise to 3 million tons/year next year.

Australia is next on the list and it appears to have passed peak oil production, and as a result exports have dropped from over 500 kbd in 2007, to just above 300 kbd today. The declines in production are expected to continue

"The recent start-up of BHP Billiton's Pyrenees oil field and Apache's Van Gogh field - both situated off Western Australia's north-west coast - will provide a boost in the short-term, however the long-term trend is for production to keep falling," EnergyQuest Chief Executive Officer, Dr Graeme Bethune, said today.

(this from April 2010). Current production is at around 540 kbd, having fallen 40 kbd in 2010.

The decline with a projected drop of 85% in 10 years can be seen from this graph:

Anticipated future Australian production (Geoscience Australia )

At the same time Australian consumption has been steadily rising, and is hovering just below 1 mbd.

Australian oil consumption (Index mundi )

In contrast Australian natural gas reserves are significant. As with Malaysia it has supplied LNG to Japan, starting in 1989 and has just signed a $41 billion contract for a 20-year supply of LNG from the Gorgon field, taking 2.25 million tons of the anticipated 15 million tons (0.75 Tcf) of annual production anticipated from the field, as overall gas production continues to rise.

Current estimates of Australian natural gas reserves are of over 108 Tcf


Colombia (Source EIA )

Colombia sits next to Venezuela, and I referred to some of the interplay between the two countries in an earlier post on Venezuela. Production of oil has fluctuated but has recently been increasing, so that it is now running at 800 kbd, and this is anticipated to increase to 1.2 mbd by 2012. It is thus one of the few countries that might be able to increase supply to the United States as some of the more traditional sources lose production.

Colombia oil statistics (Energy Export Databrowser )

The problems that currently exist relate to the need for additional pipeline capacity to carry the newly developed reserves to a point where they can be exported. Investments in the country from China, among others, support a prediction of further growth to 1.4 mbd by 2014.

As I referred to in the Venezuelan post, some of Colombia’s natural gas has been exported to Venezuela, with the intent that in 2012, as the Colombian reserves start to decline the flow can reverse. Much of the natural gas has been used for improving oil production in the past with the country consuming some 265 Bcf while producing 318 Bcf.

Ecuador (EIA )

And the final country producing more than 500 kbd is Ecuador, although that was in 2008, and by last year production had fallen to 485 kbd. The country shows the more standard shape illustrating the Export Land model with an accelerated decline in exports as consumption rises, even as overall production now falls.

Ecuador oil statistics (Energy Export Databrowser )

It would seem, since Ecuador exports to the United States, that the increase in Colombian production is timely.

In regard to natural gas, perhaps the EIA says it best

Ecuador has relatively small proven natural gas reserves and a limited natural gas market.

The supply that it has is used internally, mainly for electricity generation, while much of that associated with oil is either flared or reinjected to help with production.

P51. Pick Points

Half-a-dozen or so stories of interest:

The energy lobby is not thrilled about the latest plans to increase taxes on the industry and is now forming a group to speak up for the industry. As an alternative North Dakota is thinking about putting 25% of the oil generated income into a trust fund. While Ecuador is going after some unpaid taxes that it claims Perenco, a French oil company, owes due to the “extraordinary profits” the company has made. Michigan’s Governor is asking for a gas tax to fix the crumbling roads in the state. The intent is to shift the rate from a per gallon, to a percentage of the price. Because state and federal revenues from existing taxes are no longer enough the Congress is also looking at ways to restructure the system to raise more revenue, one of the thoughts being considered is a mileage charge. Massachusetts has a similar problem, and are considering a 25% increase in the state gas tax (which would bring in about $650 million), as is Oregon.


Ugo Bardi has his post on “Fire and Ice” up on the main TOD board, (it was on TOD Europe before) and just for the historical record, it was I (not some guy from the USGS) who disagreed with Dave Rutledge down at ASPO 2007 – which did not stop the pair of us, with a group of others, adjourning to the bar to discuss the topic thereafter.

Speaking of conferences the MIT student Energy Club just held their conference at which the Swedish company Vattenfall said that they would be carbon neutral by 2050. Sweden has previously said that it will wean itself from oil within the next fifteen years . Sweden gets most of its electricity from nuclear and from hydro, so that the major use of fossil fuels is in transportation. I should be in Sweden this weekend (there will be a slight hiatus since it is a long flight and I am going to work) so I will post on what I hear.

At the start of an Energy Conference in Qatar the Exxon CEO has used their success with Qatar (they will have doubled the LNG production to 62 million tonnes this year, leading to the establishment of fourth and fifth LNG trains). Half the vessels for the 4th train are now delivered, and 5 of the 6 for the 5th train. The LNG is coming into a market that is currently seeing (outside of South Asia) a surplus of natural gas (hence all the rig closures in the US) and the LNG entry is likely to soften the market further. However if the predictions of a drop in US well production hold up, then the LNG will be coming on market just as it would otherwise tighten. China, which currently uses 13 million tonnes of LNG , with imports from Russia and Kazakhstan, is also aiming for a target of 60 million tonnes a year by 2020, with some of that to come from Qatar. A local shortage of natural gas is also causing Saudi Arabia to fast-track the development of two off-shore gas fields.

Development of the Arabiyah and Hisbah gas fields, which are not associated with oil production, would supply around 1.8 billion cubic feet per day, MEES reported. The projects were included in Aramco's expansion plan through 2014, it said.

"Bringing these fields on line would make sense," one industry source in the kingdom told Reuters yesterday. "They really need the gas."

Success offshore has not been matched with equivalent searches for natural gas on land, and particularly in the Empty Quarter.

Utility operators in the United States continue to be concerned over the future of coal, and are scrapping even more plans for expansion, part of the problem lies in the uncertainty over future regulation. Just this past week a utility in Montana has given up on the fight with local environmentalists and will now be installing a gas-fired plant, even though the costs may be higher. There are still, however, some 28 coal-fired plants under construction. To prevent more ash dam failures, EPA is seeking the necessary information on the sites where such impoundments exist. There may be as many as 300. Idaho Power, having seen the writing on the wall, has also changed its mind, and instead of a coal-fired plant will be installing a 300 MW plant in Payette county. The site is close to an existing gas pipeline, and an existing 230-kV transmission line. Now all they need to worry about is the long-term availability of the fuel.

A small note, it appears that having not had them built for very long, China has already filled the current round of tanks for their Strategic Petroleum Reserve and is thinking of adding more storage using tankers. (Which suggests they don’t think prices will stay down much longer, either). They currently have 34 days of supply in storage., but this may not count the 100 million barrels in the reserve. China is actively chasing after oil, and trying to ensure supplies when the price is right. And there are still those who think that the floor of the market has not yet arrived and that prices can sink some more.

And Pakistan has decided to go ahead with a gas pipeline from Iran, without having Indian participation.

More stories can be found at The Energy Bulletin and Drumbeat at The Oil Drum.

How do we make up for Mexico's declining exports?

The current turmoil over the supply of gas from Russia, highlights the increasing dependence that the world has to place on energy supplies from a shrinking pool of suppliers. This past week the Energy Information Agency (EIA) shows that the United States imported some 14.5 million barrels of oil a day (mbd). Domestically we produced 4.9 mbd, having fallen below 5 mbd just as the calendar kicked over into December, 2008. The October import figures the most recent available, (pdf) show 6 mbd came from OPEC countries and 7.4 mbd from non-OPEC nations.

This supply came from a total of 49 countries, ten of whom are in OPEC and 39 of whom aren’t. However if we count only countries that contributed more than 250,000 bd to this supply we end up with Canada (2,567 kbd); Saudi Arabia (1,487 kbd); Mexico (1,483 kbd); Venezuela (1,162 kbd); Nigeria (979 kbd); Iraq (577 kbd); Algeria (555 kbd); Angola (539 kbd); Russia (394 kbd); Brazil (354 kbd); the United Kingdom (386 kbd): and the U.S. Virgin Islands (267 kbd).

One of the reasons for putting the list up here and now is that we can come back, next year and see how things have changed, and note how and where the dependence has moved to. But, as I noted in Pick Points, Mexican production has fallen to around 3 mbd, of which half is exported to the U.S., and if their production continues to fall at 500,000 bd per year, then within this next year there is going to be some greater crunch between domestic use and exports. So where will the United States make up the difference?


Now the volume each supplies varies by month, two months ago Norway supplied (for that month) 2.175 mbd so that drawing conclusions from a single month is of no great value, but if one goes back and looks at figures for 2007 (pdf), one ends up with almost the same list, only Brazil having since joined (by 154 kbd). In 2005 the top 14 countries importing to the US would have dropped off Russia, Brazil and the U.S. Virgin Islands, but Colombia, Ecuador, Kuwait and Equatorial Guinea were still on it.

The largest proportion of the U.S. imports come from Canada, yet outside of the Oil Sands of Alberta and the possibilities of production from the Bakken shale, their production has been declining, with the Newfoundland fields perhaps peaking at 369 kbd in 2007. The oil sand production, currently at 1.4 mbd is scheduled to increase, with an initial target of 3.5 mbd, once planned for 2015, but now slipped back to 2020. Unfortunately for US consumers, there are two snags to relying on this source to offset Mexican declines. The first is the slowing of the expansion plans of those working the oil sands as prices fall; the second is:

The 2007 federal energy bill says U.S. government fleets can't buy fuel from the oil sands and other sources whose production emits more greenhouse gases than conventional oil.

And if someone gets serious about enforcing that . . . . .
So if Canada cannot expand their production enough, and Mexico is going to cut their exports, for the sake of discussion by 0.5 mbd, where do we look to next?

That would be Saudi Arabia, from which we get about 1.5 mbd. But Saudi Arabia is a strong advocate of OPEC production cuts and has already dropped their production from a peak of 9.7 mbd to 8.5 mbd in November. While it may go lower, probably not below 8 mbd, they have just warned Asian customers that cuts, of up to 15% will continue. So no luck there.

Moving down the list of suppliers, in terms of import size, that takes us to Venezuela. This is an interesting case, since there is a fairly large difference between how much oil the country says it is producing (3 mbd) and the amount others have estimated (2.4 mbd). In accord with OPEC wishes to cut production, so that prices will move back up, Venezuela is cutting some 189 kbd or production, 166 kbd of which was going to the United States. So I guess we’d better not look there.

Next on the list, moving down, is Nigeria, where we get just under 1 mbd. Well they are currently exporting, in total, around 1.66 mbd, but this is a cut of 12% (from 1.88 mbd) to accord with OPEC requests.. Although the country has a potential to produce perhaps 2.5 mbd, the problems that have been created by widespread conflict has pulled it down to perhaps the current level, although, with perhaps as much as 200,000 being siphoned off to illicit sales, it is going to be difficult to estimate true production – but I wouldn’t gamble on getting more out either.

And so we come to Iraq, which has now, with 0.577 mbd, made it to sixth on the list. A year ago I would have thought that increasing that number would have been almost impossible, but the nation is moving ahead with plans to double oil production (from around 2.5 mbd today, of which 1.85 mbd is exported), within three or four years. If this can be achieved, and one of the fields planned for expansion lies beneath Baghdad, then this could solve the US shortage , if not . .

The next candidate on the list is Algeria. But while their production is continuing to rise, together with exports, they also hosted the latest OPEC meeting with its call for 3.3 mbd of oil cuts. Thus while the US may get up to about a third of their exports, of about 2 mbd total production, their share is not going to go up in the short term, even though they hope, when markets grow, to increase production to 2.6 mbd by 2018..

Angola is eighth, but as a member of OPEC they are falling in line to drop production, from the 1.9 mbd that they produced in 2008, even though new fields are coming into production, and the production cut is anticipated to lower this to 1.5 mbd.

At ninth in line, there is Russia. But while Russia now vies with Saudi Arabia to be the worlds largest producer of oil, it has announced that it will go along with the OPEC cuts and, in collaboration with Azerbaijan, reduce their output by 600,000 bd. There is also a question as to whether overall Russian production has not peaked, since production last year fell year-on-year (Y-o-Y) by 815 kbd, to 9.74 mbd, with exports falling 16% to 3.53 mbd. Guess we had better not look there.

And so we come to the tenth candidate – which is Brazil. Brazil reached energy in 2006, but though a lot of credit was given to sugar cane ethanol the reality is that it was achieved with increased production of oil, particularly from offshore. However the costs for developing those fields is above the current price of selling the oil from those fields. So maybe we should not send out tankers down there yet.

Hmm, well lets see where that leaves us, Can it be that we are left hoping for production increases from Iraq as our likely savior, should demand start to resurrect?


.